On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 15:04 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On 1 Jun 2011 21:54, "Ville SkyttÃ" <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647 > > > > I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default > install. In > > my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and > with my > > upstream hat on I expect things to further improve before F-16 is > out. > > > > Why I'm writing here is that I'd like to hear opinions to which > > default-installed comps group should it be added (and set as default > > there) - in my opinion the serious candidates are admin-tools and > base. > > admin-tools doesn't sound right because bash-completion is not > really > > an admin tool (unless one considers interactive shell usage as admin > > activity in general), so I'm inclined to add it to base. > > > > Thoughts? > > Things like bash completion have massive performance implications on > network and other slower file systems esp if its used for home > directories. It certainly shouldn't be in base. > +1 - I've found the impact of bash completion on disconnected machines to be negative. I don't install it anymore for that reason. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
