On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 07:02:04PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > On 05/14/2011 06:10 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > > > It used to be a module, but was converted to built-in as we were always > > loading it in the network scripts. A lot of the decisions made in > > those '5 second boot' days seem a bit boneheaded in hindsight. > > For f16, we should do a good re-review of such decisions, and decide what > > makes sense and what doesn't, and where possible fix the startup scripts > > instead of working around them. > > indeed, the *complete kernel config* should be reviewed by the fedora > kernel team. > There are modules included(yes) in the kernel, missing options and > modules, etc... > > These greps should help: > > look for static values: > $ egrep -v "=m|=y|is not set" config > > look for missing features/modules: > $ egrep -v "=\"|=[0-9]|=m|=y" config > > look for "yes", included features/modules: > $ egrep -v "=\"|=[0-9]|=m|is not set" config > > and also take a look to menuconfig. For the 'missing' options, there's usually a reason why they haven't been enabled. We could do a better job at documenting those decisions (perhaps even in the config files themselves) Dave -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel