2011/4/30 Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/29/2011 06:56 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> On Fri, 29.04.11 00:37, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir >>> is directly under /. >> >> Yes, I think this would be a good thing to have in F16. >> >> Note however that this needs a tiny kernel patch to work, to create the >> mount point under /sys/fs/selinux. This is a trivial patch and has been >> done for /sys/fs/cgroup before, so I assume this would be easy to get >> in and just needs a champion to push this forward. >> >>> By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv >>> existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists >>> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#PURPOSE16A >>> but "The methodology used to name subdirectories of /srv is >>> unspecified as there is currently no consensus on how this should be >>> done" - so even the authors of the standard did not have anything to >>> say about how this directory should be used. Is there a rational >>> reason for the existence of this directory besides FHS conformance? >> >> I think /srv actually makes a lot of sense. Probably not so much on the >> desktop, but the boundaries are blurry, and I see no reason to set >> things up differently in this respect between servers and desktops. I >> see little benefit in removing this directory. >> >> Lennart >> > I think moving /selinux is a bit more complicated then just a simple > kernel change. We have libselinux changes, Lots of tools have learned > over the years the path of /selinux and lots of users know about it. > > I am willing to work towards the goal of moving /selinux, but I might > end up with a symbolic link if we can not fix all of the problems. What was the original intention of creating selinux directory directly under / ? Was this file system created at a 2.4 times when sysfs didn't existed yet? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAk27RKUACgkQrlYvE4MpobOCoACgvLrAnXtzvxV7ztHP4aiGr8Df > VZ4AnAnqTzUofp62+IHkc9WmTvh74sRE > =NLi7 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > systemd-devel mailing list > systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel > -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
