On Fri, 29.04.11 00:37, MichaÅ Piotrowski (mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Hi, > > I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir > is directly under /. Yes, I think this would be a good thing to have in F16. Note however that this needs a tiny kernel patch to work, to create the mount point under /sys/fs/selinux. This is a trivial patch and has been done for /sys/fs/cgroup before, so I assume this would be easy to get in and just needs a champion to push this forward. > By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv > existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists > http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#PURPOSE16A > but "The methodology used to name subdirectories of /srv is > unspecified as there is currently no consensus on how this should be > done" - so even the authors of the standard did not have anything to > say about how this directory should be used. Is there a rational > reason for the existence of this directory besides FHS conformance? I think /srv actually makes a lot of sense. Probably not so much on the desktop, but the boundaries are blurry, and I see no reason to set things up differently in this respect between servers and desktops. I see little benefit in removing this directory. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
