On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 02:29 -0700, Ryan Rix wrote: > On Tue 26 April 2011 21:58:08 Mathieu Bridon wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 15:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > it is better to have the package (even if it's poorly > > > maintained) than to not have it at all! > > > > I think that's where some of us disagree with you. > > > > Having lots of parts of poor quality doesn't raise the global quality of > > Fedora. Having only a few parts, each of excellent quality, does. > > Yeah, it's great until users start leaving for distros which actually have > packages of stuff they use. The alternative being that users leave for distros which actually properly maintain packages of stuff they use. :) -- Mathieu -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
