On Tue 26 April 2011 21:58:08 Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 15:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > it is better to have the package (even if it's poorly > > maintained) than to not have it at all! > > I think that's where some of us disagree with you. > > Having lots of parts of poor quality doesn't raise the global quality of > Fedora. Having only a few parts, each of excellent quality, does. Yeah, it's great until users start leaving for distros which actually have packages of stuff they use. r -- Ryan Rix == http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://rix.si/ == == http://rix.si/page/contact/ if you need a word ==
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
