On 04/19/2011 01:33 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:40:22 -0700, AW wrote: > We've always had the rule of thumb that packagers should not vote for > their own updates. It is assumed that the packagers test their own updates > and don't need to be explicit about their confidence in the update with > karma points in bodhi. > > One goal of the update acceptance criteria for pre-releases is also that > _anyone_ gets an opportunity to try out a test-update before it is marked > stable. > > Anyway, I think I've seen counted "self-votes" also for older dists, but not > done by many packagers. I may have added karma to an update or two of mine. Usually with packages that can break more critical services than regular packages. The reason being is that I can test on my local workstation and in a VM, however it isn't the same environment as my live servers. So I test locally, push to updates-testing and consume it on my production machines. If good, then I usually add karma. I think its fairly rare for me, and I can only think of one package where I do that... -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
