Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> Some packagers have been observed circumventing the system by configuring
> a karma threshold of 1, so their own +1 vote or the first one from an arbitrary
> tester make it possible to mark the update stable.

Not...really. The update submitter's own vote should count as 0 (I can't
remember if this has landed in current Bodhi yet). Setting the karma
threshold to 1 cannot circumvent the 'proventesters +1 and any +1'
requirement for stable releases; just try it, it doesn't work. The
correct requirements are enforced whatever you set the autopush
threshold to.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux