Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> said: > The place for system configuration is /etc. I have yet to see a really > convincing example why /etc/sysconfig/ or /etc/default would win us > anything. /etc/sysconfig is essentially configuration for the init system managing daemons. Command-line options, which sub-bits to run, etc. that are not settable in the daemon configuration files themselves. I think having them in a sub-directory is much cleaner (and makes them easier to distinguish from the "regular" daemon config files). I don't think /etc/default is a good name (if that indeed is what Debian uses), because they are options you change to get non-default behavior. > I am pretty sure that the vast majority of files in there are > pretty much unnecessary and their configuration could be solved in a > different way much nicer. I've used a bunch of them to change the ways various daemons run, so I would definately say they are not "pretty much unnecessary". They are also shell scripts that are sourced by init scripts, so there is flexibility to make changes that may not have even been anticipated by the init script authors. Since they are config files (unlike the init scripts themselves), changing them doesn't leave you with RPM wanting to replace them on every package update either. > So yeah, I'd push for phasing /etc/sysconfig out for most services, not > standardize it. I'd be 180 degrees from that. -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
