On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 05:31:35PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 14.04.11 16:35, Michal Hlavinka (mhlavink@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > > On Thursday, April 14, 2011 15:48:09 Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Thu, 14.04.11 14:51, Michal Hlavinka (mhlavink@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, April 14, 2011 13:26:02 Michal Schmidt wrote: > > > > > On 04/14/2011 11:14 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote: > > > > > > d) split it to more service files and make dependency there > > > > > > > > > > > > this would be incompatible change in configuration and hard to do, > > > > > > > > > > Hard maybe, but solvable. Incompatibility happens from time to time. > > > > > That's what release notes are for. > > > > > > > > Upstream has their cross-distribution packaging "guidelines" / effort / ... > > > > (I can't find the proper description.) Making configuration work different > > > > way then on other systems won't make anyone happy. If there is a way to > > > > keep current configuration working, then it's the way it will be done. Option c) > > > > would work, I'm just looking for another possibility to make it work the same > > > > way but also more systemd-like way. > > > > > > I presume their guidelines just cover SysV-style bootups? > > > > It's not only about SysV, but also says something like: when user starts nut, it should > > start exactly those services that are needed based on > > /etc/sysconfig/nut MODE=? option > > /etc/sysconfig/xxx is mostly a Fedora/Red Hat idiom. I am pretty sure > the Debian version of the boot scripts do not honour this request. Debian has mostly identical /etc/default/xxx. > > Also I don't see how is this different from for example dovecot (pop3 and imap server) > > where master process starts auth, imapd, pop3d,... there just is no master process. > > This was handled by init script, because it was sufficient for this job. So it seems that > > systemd is not capable of doing this and "master" script will solve > > this. > > Dovecot upstream actually comes with systemd support including socket > activation. I haven't tried it myself but it sounds as if dovecot is > perfectly compatible with systemd ;-) I'm using F15 dovecot package on F14. Works perfectly. (F14 dovecot package omits unit files). -- Tomasz Torcz ,,(...) today's high-end is tomorrow's embedded processor.'' xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx -- Mitchell Blank on LKML -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
