Re: rfc/headsup: graphics driver packaging in F16+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 04:03:48AM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:09:36 +0200, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > In any case, it's vital that VESA work given that it's the only 
> > way to bring up hardware that's newer than the install image - 
> > increasing its test coverage can only be a good thing.
> 
> It does not make sense to test VESA as we cannot fix VESA.
> (That is the BIOS part; I doubt the VESA xorg driver needs too much testing.)

Not so much the vesa driver, but x86emu tends to have a bewildering 
array of bugs.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux