Re: rfc/headsup: graphics driver packaging in F16+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:16:45 +0200, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> While I don't care about accelerated X support, this hardware darned 
> well better continue working in an "it works" 2D display mode.  VESA or 
> whatever is fine.

VESA is not fine, ancient Free drivers are debuggable code when something
crashes, VESA is a proprietary code one cannot debug. It can for example crash
in the VESA code due to a bug in Fedora code corrupting its stack etc, this is
difficult to debug.

Why is proposed a proprietary code over existing Free drivers?

The size of `retrocomputing' drivers is negligible and the maintenance of them
needs to be done anyway.


Jan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux