On 04/11/2011 01:21 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 12:13 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
>> On 04/10/2011 07:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 18:19:26 -0700,
>>> Christopher Aillon<caillon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I just realized today for the first time that our nightlies are
>>>> based on
>>>> stable, not testing. I think that's something we need to address.
>>>> It's
>>>> probably still useful to have nightlies based on stable, but I think
>>>> it's rather vital to have images created with the updates in the queue.
>>>
>>> The nightlies are intended to be made from stable, so that they are more
>>> likely to work and near releases (including test ones) corrsepond to
>>> the upcoming release.
>>
>> I definitely agree that the nightlies need to be made from stable
>> sources.
>
> And I did too. I also agree that we need to get nightlies made with
> testing. I don't think this is an either-or situation.
Good point, I didn't mean to imply that it had to be one or the other;
just that testing-based nightlies alone aren't enough.
My next questions would be:
- Is this needed often enough to justify building another nightly?
-> Or would it be more effort than it's worth to build testing
based nightlies on a less regular basis?
- If so, what would need to be done in order to propose this and
hopefully see it happen?
Tim
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
