On Wed, 30.03.11 12:41, David Lutterkort (lutter@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 09:30 -0400, R P Herrold wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > > > There are many directories already in Fedora that are not > > > defined by FHS and even though we have asked them to update > > > it (libexec, /selinux /sys etc), there is noone maintaining > > > it. > > > > This is stunningly untrue. I've worked for years in the > > fields of LSB, FHS and LANANA to make sure there are traceable > > paths for such requests. Post the URLs to your bugs in the > > LSB / LF tracker if you assert you have done such > > How do changes to the FHS actually happen ? All I can find is the names > of the three past editors of the standard, and a mailing list that seems > to be overrun by spam. > > There doesn't seem to be any body/group that meets regularly to resolve > issues and work towards an FHS update. I wonder if the LSB folks feel responsible for this. Not that I was a big fan of the LSB work (making up "standards" out of thin air and stuff), but there's at least somebody commited to standards. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
