On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 09:30 -0400, R P Herrold wrote: > On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > There are many directories already in Fedora that are not > > defined by FHS and even though we have asked them to update > > it (libexec, /selinux /sys etc), there is noone maintaining > > it. > > This is stunningly untrue. I've worked for years in the > fields of LSB, FHS and LANANA to make sure there are traceable > paths for such requests. Post the URLs to your bugs in the > LSB / LF tracker if you assert you have done such How do changes to the FHS actually happen ? All I can find is the names of the three past editors of the standard, and a mailing list that seems to be overrun by spam. There doesn't seem to be any body/group that meets regularly to resolve issues and work towards an FHS update. Maybe it is time to set up such a group, e.g., by letting each distro put one representative forward that will discuss and vote on FHS changes on that distro's behalf. I think the group that Lennart worked with is a very encouraging sign that something like this is possible. David -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
