On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 11:16 -0700, John Reiser wrote: > On 03/30/2011 11:01 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:55 -0700, John Reiser wrote: > >> On 03/30/2011 10:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > >>> It's perfectly possible, and has been done lots > >>> of times, to simply go ahead and commit significant changes that _could_ > >>> have been 'features', not submit them as features, and happily bypass > >>> the entire 'feature' process with all its bureaucracy. /run would > >>> certainly not be close to being the first time this has happened. > >> > >> Please give specific examples that previously evaded the 'feature' process. > > > > I have better things to do than spend my morning looking through old > > changelogs and freeze dates, thanks. Are you really suggesting it's > > never happened? > > Giving specific examples, instead of only claiming "lots of times", > will help focus the discussion towards what really matters. > Terms with differing interpretations tend to feed flame wars. > If not even one specific case can be named from memory then > "lots of times" is doubtful. Please see the better response Rahul gave, and consider this sub-thread dead =) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
