On Wed, 30.03.11 15:03, Ralf Corsepius (rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > I also don't think you can really justify the "massive" qualifier in your > > assertion. The actual text of the (7 year old) FHS has this to say: > 7 year old doesn't mean obsolete and doesn't mean to adopt any crack > ridden idea somebody comes up with. Thanks for implying we were addicted to crack. It really underlines your arguments. > Any ordinary Fedora contributor with a similar proposal would have been > "sent to hell". Uh? What are you implying here? Note that I myself was actually leaning towards a different solution for a long time, just so I don't have to deal with negative people like you. But other folks were championing for /run (especially from Debian), and they convinced me and the others with stakes in this, and so we implemented this. This is how these things usually work: everybody can make suggestions, and the best one which convinced the key people who can implement something like this wins in the end. In this case the idea was not mine. So really no need to imply my humble ideas were in any way special here or had more weight than anybody else's, since well, this one wasn't even mine. > > No standard is or even should be carved in stone for all eternity. > Right, but devs should ignore it or feel tempted to rape such a standard. Wow, crack addicted rapists. Die Wahl Deiner Worte adelt wahrlich Deine Gedanken! Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
