> > As long as packages for Rawhide are not signed, any recommendation to > use them on production systems is a step backwards for Fedora. Actually > there should be more prominent recommendations not to use Rawhide on > production systems. > Yah ... also rawhide, a rolling build, and a rolling release are not the same at all ... and a rolling release is more like what is being asked for I susoect. Some have argued that fedora itself is a rolling release - others look for something more closely resembling the kernel dev model (there are some differences between kernel dev and distro however ... tho more in detail than idea) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
