On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 01:14 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > For Tim: have you considered doing something similar to RPMFusion akmod, > i.e. modifying hp-setup/hp-plugin to build an appropriate package > on-the-fly? Also, the binary plugins get installed under /usr/share/hplip, > which is against the packaging guidelines (binaries should go in /usr/lib > or /usr/lib64, depending on the arch). I haven't considered that, no. > For Tim and legal folks: has anyone tried asking HP to open-source the > plugins and the firmware or at least changing the license for the plugins > and the firmwares to one allowing redistribution? The latter would make > the firmwares acceptable for Fedora and the plugins acceptable for > RPMFusion. HP won't open-source them unfortunately. I don't know whether they will change the license to allow for redistribution. Tim. */
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
