Michael Schwendt (mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx) said: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:45:54 +0100, Michael wrote: > > > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:46:09 +0900 (JST), Akira wrote: > > > > > BN> Orphan: apel > > > BN> ddskk requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 > > > BN> emacs-common-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 > > > BN> emacs-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 > > > BN> flim requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 > > > BN> migemo-emacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 > > > BN> migemo-xemacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 > > > > > > apel has just been renamed to emacs-apel because of the > > > naming guidelines. the above packages has to be rebuilt > > > against emacs-apel instead of apel. > > > > When renaming a package you would normally add a good Obsoletes/Provides > > pair for the old name and drop that only after an appropriate period of > > time (e.g. 2-3 dist releases). Has that been done for "apel"? > > $ repoquery --whatprovides apel > apel-0:10.7-4.fc12.noarch > emacs-apel-0:10.8-1.fc14.noarch > apel-0:10.7-4.fc12.noarch > > What do the other packages require a specific VR of apel? > Is that necessary or just too strict? I believe it's just an artifact of the script that checks for requires; if something else provides apel, we can drop the original apel package. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
