Michael Schwendt wrote, at 02/24/2011 08:48 PM +9:00: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:45:54 +0100, Michael wrote: > >> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:46:09 +0900 (JST), Akira wrote: >> >>> BN> Orphan: apel >>> BN> ddskk requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 >>> BN> emacs-common-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 >>> BN> emacs-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 >>> BN> flim requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 >>> BN> migemo-emacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 >>> BN> migemo-xemacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 >>> >>> apel has just been renamed to emacs-apel because of the >>> naming guidelines. the above packages has to be rebuilt >>> against emacs-apel instead of apel. >> >> When renaming a package you would normally add a good Obsoletes/Provides >> pair for the old name and drop that only after an appropriate period of >> time (e.g. 2-3 dist releases). Has that been done for "apel"? > > $ repoquery --whatprovides apel > apel-0:10.7-4.fc12.noarch > emacs-apel-0:10.8-1.fc14.noarch > apel-0:10.7-4.fc12.noarch > > What do the other packages require a specific VR of apel? > Is that necessary or just too strict? Well, I just checked one example and http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=2376622 says that emacs-w3m has just "Requires: apel" and does not have such strict version-specific dependency. Regards, Mamoru -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
