On Wed, 23.02.11 13:43, Toshio Kuratomi (a.badger@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:33:33PM +0100, MichaÅ Piotrowski wrote: > > 2011/2/23 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > If a particular piece of software is going to convert from systemv init > > > scripts to systemd unit files we'll end up with two important rpm files. > > > One that is before the conversion and has sysv init scripts and one that is > > > after the conversion and has systemd unit files. > > > > IFAIU RPM after conversion should have both - sysv init scripts and > > systemd services. > > Why do you want to remove sysvinit scripts? Both scripts can coexist > > without any problem. > > > Agreement in the packaging committee is that we want one or the other but > not both because of the confusion having both will cause to people using the > package. For example, if both are installed, a system admin might try to edit the > SysVinit script and not understand why his changes aren't having an effect > on the system. Well, we tried hard to make this visible: "systemctl status" (or for the matter service foo status) will make visible from which source a file is read. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
