On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:33:33PM +0100, MichaÅ Piotrowski wrote: > 2011/2/23 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx>: > > If a particular piece of software is going to convert from systemv init > > scripts to systemd unit files we'll end up with two important rpm files. > > One that is before the conversion and has sysv init scripts and one that is > > after the conversion and has systemd unit files. > > IFAIU RPM after conversion should have both - sysv init scripts and > systemd services. > Why do you want to remove sysvinit scripts? Both scripts can coexist > without any problem. > Agreement in the packaging committee is that we want one or the other but not both because of the confusion having both will cause to people using the package. For example, if both are installed, a system admin might try to edit the SysVinit script and not understand why his changes aren't having an effect on the system. The brief version of that is in the first note here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/Systemd_Revised_Draft#Unit_Files -Toshio
Attachment:
pgp8gBZSB1vxY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
