Re: Plans for BTRFS in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/23/2011 03:33 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:08:08PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett<mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  said:
>>> You can't move PVs.
>>
>> What do you think pvmove does?
>
> Move PEs from one PV to another. You can't move a PV.
>
>>> You need a separate /boot.
>>
>> That's needed for more than just LVM (and probably won't go away, as it
>> is a lot simpler to handle a single method in the installer).
>
> Unless you're booting off iSCSI or really, really love software RAID
> (which btrfs also kindly simplifies), the only reason you need a
> separate /boot is because we're slow at putting updated filesystem
> support in grub because there's no need because we default to a separate
> /boot. There's a certain amount of circularity there.

Also we need to have the initramfs on an unencrypted chunk of disk.

>>> If you use more than one
>>> disk then it adds significant fragility to the boot process.
>>
>> How does it do that (any more than any other multi-disk setup)?
>
> My experience with LVM is that any number of error states dump me into
> an awkward recovery scenario. Again it's not an inherent problem with
> the technology, more just that because nobody outside the enterprise
> world really cares about LVM nobody has bothered making it easy for
> non-sysadmins to handle this stuff.

Yep.

-- 
         Peter

RFC 882 put the dots in .com.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux