Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > You can't move PVs. What do you think pvmove does? > You need a separate /boot. That's needed for more than just LVM (and probably won't go away, as it is a lot simpler to handle a single method in the installer). > If you use more than one > disk then it adds significant fragility to the boot process. How does it do that (any more than any other multi-disk setup)? > It slows > down booting. Cite numbers? It was slower early on, but it goes right by now. I don't doubt it adds some time (of course), but I don't see it being any significant amount. > It provides some functionality that's hugely useful in a > small number of cases, and in every other case it just makes your life > more complicated. For most, it doesn't make things any more complicated (because they never touch it). I'd say that LVM is useful in a growing number of cases. > btrfs does the former without anywhere near as much of > the latter. Oh, I don't object to btrfs and having the basic volume management in the filesystem layer. AdvFS on DEC Unix was great in that respect. I object to your painting of LVM aw "awful". -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel