On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Jonathan Dieter <jdieter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 14:18 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Jonathan Dieter <jdieter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 16:19 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >> >> I'm actually quite interested in btrfs especially for servers because >> >> of it's features >> > >> > For what it's worth, we've been running btrfs on our school fileservers >> > since September. After a few teething problems (fixed by >> > increasing /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes), we've had pretty much zero >> > trouble. >> > >> >> Wait what? I know we use lots o ram, but you shouldn't have to bump >> min_free_kbytes. What were you seeing? Thanks, > > Sorry, I didn't mean to imply it was btrfs that was causing the problem. > We got new servers when we did our upgrade and ran into problems with > the e1000e kernel module being unable to allocate memory even though > there was loads free. Bumping up min_free_kbytes fixed it. > > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626851 for more detail. > Ah ok, good, nevermind then :), Joesf -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
