On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 11:04 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Am 31.01.2011 22:47, schrieb Martin Langhoff:
> > Consider this file from nxt_python package:
> >
> > cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-lego.rules
> > BUS=="usb", SYSFS{idVendor}=="0694", GROUP="lego", MODE="0660"
> >
> > Is it safe & sane to include an identical udev rule file in the nbc
> > package with different filename? To state the obvious -- it'd use the
> > same group name and mode.
> >
> > Fallback plan is to prep a package just for this udev rule and depend
> > on it, but it seems unnecesary overhead.
> >
> >
> > m
>
> Yes, it would be safe. It's just code duplication.
> Why does it use group "lego"? Is there a daemon running?
> Or should the console user have access to it?
>
FWIW, I'd really like to see the console user have access to this by
default. Then, uploading a file to the NXT brick would be plug and
play.
Jonathan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
