Re: Multiple identical udev rules -- safe?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 11:04 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Am 31.01.2011 22:47, schrieb Martin Langhoff:
> > Consider this file from nxt_python package:
> > 
> >   cat  /etc/udev/rules.d/70-lego.rules
> >   BUS=="usb", SYSFS{idVendor}=="0694", GROUP="lego", MODE="0660"
> > 
> > Is it safe & sane to include an identical udev rule file in the nbc
> > package with different filename? To state the obvious -- it'd use the
> > same group name and mode.
> > 
> > Fallback plan is to prep a package just for this udev rule and depend
> > on it, but it seems unnecesary overhead.
> > 
> > 
> > m
> 
> Yes, it would be safe. It's just code duplication.
> Why does it use group "lego"? Is there a daemon running?
> Or should the console user have access to it?
> 

FWIW, I'd really like to see the console user have access to this by
default.  Then, uploading a file to the NXT brick would be plug and
play.

Jonathan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux