Re: Multiple identical udev rules -- safe?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 31.01.2011 22:47, schrieb Martin Langhoff:
> Consider this file from nxt_python package:
> 
>   cat  /etc/udev/rules.d/70-lego.rules
>   BUS=="usb", SYSFS{idVendor}=="0694", GROUP="lego", MODE="0660"
> 
> Is it safe & sane to include an identical udev rule file in the nbc
> package with different filename? To state the obvious -- it'd use the
> same group name and mode.
> 
> Fallback plan is to prep a package just for this udev rule and depend
> on it, but it seems unnecesary overhead.
> 
> 
> m

Yes, it would be safe. It's just code duplication.
Why does it use group "lego"? Is there a daemon running?
Or should the console user have access to it?

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux