On 01/29/2011 10:58 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: >> On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>>> New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15 >>>> Haskell process-leksah library >>> >>> Is it not possible to try a little harder to write a useful package >>> summary? Or for the package reviewer to take just a quick look and >>> notice that a summary such as that is pretty much completely useless? >>> >>> - J< >> >> >> Yes, please. Also, "new upstream version" as the only summary is not >> useful either. > > By summary, do you mean the %changelog entry? That entry represents > the changelog of the specfile/srpm, which is different than the > changelog of the software. While it is perfectly fine to write "new > upstream version" to the %changelog of the specfile, the software > changelog can (and perhaps should) go to the Notes section in bodhi. > > Orcan Well, I guess I mean the changelog of the software. Especially when it is a "new upstream version." There just needs to be more information for the new versions so a user can anticipate a potentially changed environment. Regards, OldFart -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
