On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:46:34 -0500
> Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote:
>> Â Â Â rversion=2.1
>> Â Â Â subversion=400
>>
>>
>> Â Â Â Spec file extract:
>> Â Â Â Version: %{rversion}.%{subversion}
>> Â Â Â Release: 2%{?locmark}
>> Â Â Â Source: ...../%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
>>
>> Â Â Â So the potential for disasters is real?
>
> It would help to know which package this is about. :)
It looks like the "clement" package, whose maintainer should reread
the packaging guidelines for packages with svn revisions as part of
their e-v-r combinations.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
