Re: fedpkg build version numbering discrepancy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 16:27 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 04:10 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > 	Hoping to be wrong.
> >
> > 	Today I was working on my package after a long time,
> > 	I upgraded from version 2.1-320 to 2.1-400.
> >
> > 	I didn't "fedpkg new-sources" and only updated
> > 	the spec file to be 2.1-400 (sources file was
> > 	still referring to 2.1-320).
> > 	fedpkg commit ; fedpkg push
> >
> > 	Next, fedpkg build
> >
> > 	Koji reported me 2.1-400 was compiled no trouble.
> > 	how come? new tar file was not event uploaded...
> >
> > 	Is my understanding right?, koji build
> > 	report "spec file" version while crunching
> > 	"sources file" version!
> > 	Did I missed something or we are in "easy mistake"
> > 	situation??.
> 
> Really depends if the rpm Version tag is 2.1-400 or if you are talking 
> about Version: 2.1, Release: 400.
> 
> The Release is the number of times the package at that upstream version 
	I am the upstream too.
> has been packaged. When unpacking the source it expects (unless you've 
> given it a different path) to find the sources as package-version so 
> package-2.1 in your case, and the 320,400 means nothing...
	my mistake, I used '-' while I should have use ".'
> 
> 
> If you aren't talking about Release: 400 then everything I've said above 
> is null and void and I have no idea.
	rversion=2.1
	subversion=400


	Spec file extract:
	Version: %{rversion}.%{subversion}
	Release: 2%{?locmark}
	Source: ...../%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

	So the potential for disasters is real?
	


	



-- 
A bientÃt
==========================================================================
Jean-Marc Pigeon                                   Internet: jmp@xxxxxxx
SAFE Inc.                                          Phone: (514) 493-4280
                                                   Fax:   (514) 493-1946
        Clement, 'a kiss solution' to get rid of SPAM (at last)
           Clement' Home base <"http://www.clement.safe.ca";>
==========================================================================

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux