On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 16:45 +0000, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 11:24 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 16:15 +0000, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > it would seem to make more sense, to me, to configure bodhi to re-try > > > the build, with updates-testing repo enabled, if a buildrequires for a > > > build that's been submitted to updates-testing cannot be satisfied in > > > the initial run. i.e., implement the use of the fallback repo in bodhi, > > > not in yum. > > > > How would that work? I thought a build had to be completed before it > > could be added to a bodhi update. And maintainers might wish to test a > > package against dependencies in updates-testing without being ready to > > push the new package to updates-testing. Not to mention that bodhi has > > to figure out whether a given failure was due to a missing > > BuildRequires. > > it probably makes more sense with s/bodhi/koji. =) Yes. But then we need a notion of "submitting a build to updates-testing" in koji to enable the automatic fallback, and at that point it's almost as easy for the maintainer to build against updates-testing explicitly. Either variant of the approach has the danger though that because a build needs one thing from updates-testing, it will end up getting something else from updates-testing that the maintainer didn't expect. -- Matt -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
