On 12/16/2010 05:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:03:30 -0600 > Chris Adams<cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Once upon a time, Stanislav Ochotnicky<sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> said: >>> Note that I am not saying things should go into buildroot as soon as >>> they are built, but as soon as they are in updates-testing. There >>> is a difference. There will still be reasons to use tags/overrides. >> >> That makes the push process much more fragile/difficult. If you use a >> updates-testing build of package A, and package B (that depends on >> package A) gets rebuilt, then you may have a package B that can't be >> pushed to stable until package A gets pushed. What if there's a >> security update on package B that needs to go to stable ASAP? > > Additionally, what if package A is built, after a few days serious > problems are found in it and it's deleted until the maintainer can sort > them out. What happens to packages B, C, D, and E that built against > this version? They will have broken deps. How would this scenario be different from what we have now? Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
