On Tue, 14.12.10 08:08, Chris Adams (cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > Once upon a time, Tomasz Torcz <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > > We saw it includes /dev, /dev/shm etc. Is there any *reasonable* need > > to mount sysfs somewhere else than /sys. Or /dev with mode other than 755? > > Those all directories are mounted _identically_ on every Linux distribution > > down here. Why pollute fstab with repeated lines on million machines? > > What is the advantage to making some mounts not listed in the file with > all the other mounts? It isn't like /etc/fstab is a hundred lines or > anything; it is a standard config file that predates Linux. All mounts > are listed there until systemd decided to override it (without any > warning or documentation). Well, what would be the advantage of listing it? Confusing the admin with lines that are an implementation detail of the OS? Or giving the admin the suggestion to maybe change the mount point of procfs to /waldo and see how everyting breaks? Also, the list in /etc/fstab never was complete anyway. It never listed /selinux, neither /sys/fs/cgroup (or its predecessor /cgroup), or /sys/kernel/security, or /dev/hugepages, or /dev/mqueue, or binfmt_misc, or /sys/kernel/debug, or the rpc_pipefs, or the fuse connections fs. (Also, this discussion is premature anyway, since I have not asked the Anaconda team to drop the default procfs/sysfs lines from fstab, and won't do so before F16). Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
