On Saturday, December 11, 2010 12:42:00 pm Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > On 12/11/2010 02:55 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > drago01 wrote: > >> Well ABRT should stop filing bugs in bugzilla, it does not scale PERIOD. > > > > IMHO it should file bugs in the upstream bug tracker (even if that > > tracker is not Bugzilla, so it'd have to learn as many different bug > > tracker APIs as possible). > > > > Gnash upstream actually MIGHT be able to do something about the bazillion > > crashes in their software. I definitely can't. > > > > Kevin Kofler > > This is not a first time when in see this idea and was already answered > - we're the distro and we're responsible for the packages, filling all > bugs to the upstream will make more harm then good - e.g. crash caused > by our patch or by some library which has different upstream or the bug > is already fixed in the new upstream version which is not updated in our > repositories... and these problems are for maintainers to decide before > they forward the ticket to the upstream... Some intermediate layer? It has to be easy to transfer bug to upstream or to our bugzilla. 99% of bugreports should go upstream but we still need some overview - it's bad to close eyes and say nothing crashes and if, it's somewhere in upstream. Sometimes even you can't be sure it's upstream or downstram problem. R. > Jirka -- Jaroslav ÅeznÃk <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 602 797 774 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
