Re: ABRT opt-out (was Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/11/2010 02:55 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> drago01 wrote:
>> Well ABRT should stop filing bugs in bugzilla, it does not scale PERIOD.
>
> IMHO it should file bugs in the upstream bug tracker (even if that tracker
> is not Bugzilla, so it'd have to learn as many different bug tracker APIs as
> possible).
>
> Gnash upstream actually MIGHT be able to do something about the bazillion
> crashes in their software. I definitely can't.
>
>          Kevin Kofler
>

This is not a first time when in see this idea and was already answered 
- we're the distro and we're responsible for the packages, filling all 
bugs to the upstream will make more harm then good - e.g. crash caused 
by our patch or by some library which has different upstream or the bug 
is already fixed in the new upstream version which is not updated in our 
repositories... and these problems are for maintainers to decide before 
they forward the ticket to the upstream...

Jirka
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux