Re: Proposed package blocking due to FTBFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Have you considered training up some bugzappers to help triage your
> components? They could at least work on de-duping abrt reports.

Uh, I've pretty much given up on handling ABRT reports entirely. Even if 
they were deduped, there are so many different Gnash crashes that's 
impossible to handle the flood.

> The ones he's refering to have not built since f12. It's a wonder if
> they work at all. ;)

We're backwards-compatible. At least one package in my CalcForge repository 
was built on FC5, it still works and I don't have anything to change in it, 
so I don't see why I'd rebuild it.

And several of those packages were building just fine in F13 or even F14, 
they just didn't have a rebuild issued in Koji because there was no need for 
one. It's only fair to consider the Fedora release the packages was last 
built for in Koji if we do a mass rebuild for each release.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux