On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 01:05 +0000, Bastien Nocera wrote: > And I'll go back to fixing actual bugs encountered by people instead of > random bot-driven bugs. every abrt report, ever, is an actual bug encountered by an actual person. They have to be sufficiently narked about the app crashing (and it really must have crashed) to click through a rather convoluted process (the first time, anyway) to send in a report. so are all these bugs, for that matter: they're actual bugs encountered by Matt. The package failing to build is clearly a bug. Matt tried to build it and so encountered the bug. Where does it fail to meet your criteria? I agree it's a bit questionable whether we should block packages for FTBFS, but the argument can clearly be made; being self-hosting is obviously important for an F/OSS project. At some point it devolves into Stallmanite wankery about whether you can flash your mouse, but where exactly we should draw the line isn't a slam-dunk :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
