Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/03/2010 04:09 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> We're working on this. It won't always be practical, however; in the
>> current case, for example, you need specific hardware to test mdadm.
> 
> Uh, this is md, not dm, you don't need very special HARDWARE (basically only 
> 2 HDDs, which do not even have to be identical, and you might even get away 
> with only 1 for testing, with absymal performance of course), you do need a 
> special setup though, which means repartitioning, and so isn't practical to 
> test on a production machine which isn't already set up that way.
> 
>         Kevin Kofler
> 

For non-boot devices, loopback works.  You only need the hardware if you
are testing boot time capabilities (which, admittedly, is the far more
important aspect of testing for this package).

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
              GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
	      http://people.redhat.com/dledford

Infiniband specific RPMs available at
	      http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux