Re: Is there any value to per-Fedora branch ACLs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/07/2010 10:27 AM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> The pkgdb interface distinguishes them.  Apparently there was some
> motivation for that in the first place.  If the git hooks are not
> going to distinguish them, then pkgdb should change not to either.

Currently the git ACLs do enforce per-branch ACLs.  It does make the acl
config rather lengthy and the logic behind it a bit cumbersome, but it
works.

> 
> In my own experience, I've never put someone on any ACL for a package whom
> I wouldn't trust to respect informal agreements about who should do what
> commits to which branches.  So any finer granularity on the ACL enforcement
> is to avoid accidental braino commits, if anything.

Since it's so easy to undo things in git I think this is less of a concern.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux