On 06/12/10 21:06, seth vidal wrote: > On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 21:01 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:56:19PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: >>> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 14:55 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: >>>> seth vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: >>>>> Bittorrent won't work through many/most wireless routers unless they are >>>>> not natted and/or not explicitly configured. >>>>> >>>>> what network games? >>>>> Heck, what network games do we HAVE? >>>>> >>>>> what are the use cases of zeroconf-enabled apps that we're targetting? >>>> >>>> Zeroconf and IPP browse packets are both means of making priting less >>>> of a giant pain to set up. >>> >>> ah, printing. >>> >>> Is there anything that's not last century? >> >> >> Yeah, general discovery. From the top of my head: >> - Pulseaudio sinks and sources >> - libvirt instances for virt-manager >> - VNC desktops for Vinagre >> - local web pages (think SOHO router config page) for zeroconf >> enabled Webbrowsers like Epiphany >> - remote disk management (udisks) >> - local FTP sites and WebDAV shares shown in nautilus places >> >> And this is all blocked by default Fedora firewall settings (5353/udp). >> > > I'm confused - are any of the above intended to be used/available by > anyone who is NOT experienced enough to know what iptables are and how > to manage them? B/c I think it's a bit unlikely. > > -sv > > +10 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel