2010/12/6 Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Michał Piotrowski (mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx) said: >> >> If systemd will allow us to do that, sure. >> > >> > What's the point here? For example, this doesn't cut down on the number >> > of listening ports, obviously, nor on the requirements for root passwords >> > and potential root login. And if it's started in parallel, I doubt it's a >> > huge drain on resources. >> >> "For a fast and efficient boot-up two things are crucial: >> >> * To start less. >> * And to start more in parallel." >> >> http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html >> >> IMO "start less" philosophy is a good thing. > > Yes. However, I'm leery of adding too many drastic changes that don't have > upstream buy-in yet. I understand your POV. > What's upstream openssh's opinion on socket activation? Does openssh stands out something special between other demons? > > Bill > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Best regards, Michal Sent from my iToaster -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
