MichaÅ Piotrowski (mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx) said: > >> If systemd will allow us to do that, sure. > > > > What's the point here? For example, this doesn't cut down on the number > > of listening ports, obviously, nor on the requirements for root passwords > > and potential root login. And if it's started in parallel, I doubt it's a > > huge drain on resources. > > "For a fast and efficient boot-up two things are crucial: > > * To start less. > * And to start more in parallel." > > http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html > > IMO "start less" philosophy is a good thing. Yes. However, I'm leery of adding too many drastic changes that don't have upstream buy-in yet. What's upstream openssh's opinion on socket activation? Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
