On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote: >> On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà wrote: >>> Hello, >>> I tried rebuild RPM on F-14. New RPM doesn't find all provides as it should. >>> Example: >>> RPM 4.9.alpha >>> rpm -qp --provides perl-CGI-3.50-1.fc14.noarch.rpm >>> perl-CGI = 3.50-1.fc14 >>> >>> RPM from koji: >>> rpm -qp --provides perl-CGI-3.50-1.fc15.noarch.rpm >>> perl(CGI) >>> perl(CGI::Apache) = 1.01 >>> perl(CGI::Carp) = 3.45 >>> perl(CGI::Cookie) >>> perl(CGI::Fast) >>> perl(CGI::Pretty) = 3.46 >>> perl(CGI::Push) >>> perl(CGI::Switch) = 1.01 >>> perl(CGITempFile) >>> perl(CGI::Util) = 3.48 >>> perl(Fh) >>> perl(MultipartBuffer) >>> perl(utf8) >>> perl-CGI = 3.50-1.fc15 >>> >>> I suppose RPM was looking for all strings 'package' in source code. Could >>> you look at it? As test SRPM you can use: >>> http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-CGI-3.50-1.fc14.src.rpm >> >> Yeah, that seems fairly broken. I'll have a look, thanks for testing and >> reporting - this is just the kind of stuff I want to find out /before/ >> this hits rawhide :) > > To follow up on this one: dependency extraction for perl modules is just > plain broken in the alpha due to a dumb thinko/typo kind of thing. > Additionally there's an unforeseen interaction with 'rpmdeps' use (which > the filtering macros rely on) which causes some further breakage in some > cases, including this. > > Both are easy enough to fix though, I'll push an updated snapshot in a day > or two. Okay, there's now an updated snapshot fixing this and some other issues (mono dependency extraction was probably broken too): http://laiskiainen.org/rpm/srpms/rpm-4.8.90-0.git10730.1.src.rpm - Panu - -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
