On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà wrote: > On 11/26/2010 12:20 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: >> It's that time of year again, although there seems to be an off-by-one bug >> in the calendar system causing some inconsistency in the timing wrt last >> year :P >> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-November/042339.html >> >> Anyway, before going to beta and starting the inevitable Fedora Feature >> process, we'd like some extra preliminary testing to catch out any major >> issues early on. >> >> The alpha isn't supposed to eat your system alive or anything, but proceed >> with appropriate cauting, backing up the rpmdb etc, as usual. >> >> The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0 >> and Fedora compatible SRPM(s) can be found at >> http://laiskiainen.org/rpm/srpms/ >> >> In particular, I'm interested in feedback on the new, pluggable and >> enhanced dependency extration system. Documentation is scarce at the >> moment but some background and examples can be found here: >> http://laiskiainen.org/blog/?p=35 >> >> Note that the current SRPM is missing gstreamer plugin, cups driver >> and automatic "devel-symlink" dependency generation, on purpose: the >> highly application-domain specific gstreamer + cups bits can now be fully >> moved out of rpm to gstreamer-devel etc, eliminating the need for >> embedding python inside /bin/sh scripts and such to avoid extra >> dependencies. The devel-symlink generation will stay in rpm but will >> probably change somewhat, it can be handled in a more generic fashion now. >> >> Please report any oddities found, preferably to rpm.org Trac >> at http://rpm.org/newticket or rpm-maint list (or here for fedora-specific >> discussions/suggestions etc). >> >> P.S. Pjones, before you ask ;) The much wanted ordering-only feature is >> not in the alpha, but is likely to make it into beta. The patch itself is >> fairly trivial and non-intrusive, we're just trying to figure sane spec >> syntax for it (discussion ongoing on rpm-maint) >> >> - Panu - >> >> >> >> > Hello, > I tried rebuild RPM on F-14. New RPM doesn't find all provides as it should. > Example: > RPM 4.9.alpha > rpm -qp --provides perl-CGI-3.50-1.fc14.noarch.rpm > perl-CGI = 3.50-1.fc14 > > RPM from koji: > rpm -qp --provides perl-CGI-3.50-1.fc15.noarch.rpm > perl(CGI) > perl(CGI::Apache) = 1.01 > perl(CGI::Carp) = 3.45 > perl(CGI::Cookie) > perl(CGI::Fast) > perl(CGI::Pretty) = 3.46 > perl(CGI::Push) > perl(CGI::Switch) = 1.01 > perl(CGITempFile) > perl(CGI::Util) = 3.48 > perl(Fh) > perl(MultipartBuffer) > perl(utf8) > perl-CGI = 3.50-1.fc15 > > I suppose RPM was looking for all strings 'package' in source code. Could > you look at it? As test SRPM you can use: > http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-CGI-3.50-1.fc14.src.rpm Yeah, that seems fairly broken. I'll have a look, thanks for testing and reporting - this is just the kind of stuff I want to find out /before/ this hits rawhide :) - Panu - -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
