----- "Adam Williamson" <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 21:43 -0500, Jens Petersen wrote: > > ----- "Adam Williamson" <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Agreed. I really don't see a reason to break so many packages, > even > > > if it is 'only Rawhide'. Was there a reason all these rebuilds > could not > > > be completed in the tag? > > > > Well mostly me being a slacker (I only rebuilt 50+ packages) > > If you set off a process which requires a ton of work to be done, and > you only do 500kg of work, then you're still creating a problem, even > though you did a lot of work. :) Who said there were a hundred packages - we're not there yet... Having said with the new hask metadata ghc dependency breakage will get even more noisy noisy going forward? :-/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
