Re: headsup: ghc 7 lands in rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 21:43 -0500, Jens Petersen wrote:
> ----- "Adam Williamson" <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Agreed. I really don't see a reason to break so many packages, even
> > if it is 'only Rawhide'. Was there a reason all these rebuilds could not
> > be completed in the tag?
> 
> Well mostly me being a slacker (I only rebuilt 50+ packages)

If you set off a process which requires a ton of work to be done, and
you only do 500kg of work, then you're still creating a problem, even
though you did a lot of work. :)

> and hoping to engage some of the rest of the Haskell SIG
> to help with the rebuilds.  But I will try to coordinate
> better next time and make sure all packages get rebuild
> in the -ghc tag to avoid any broken deps.

thanks, that'd be great.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux