Re: bugzilla bugzappers?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/26/2010 08:24 AM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
> Furthermore, step to reproduce also is very important, and may be we
> should enforce users fill it? For example put it in separate required
> field and check it is not empty (or may be some minimal heuristic
> against fill it like '123', 'qwerty', 'qaz' like: longer than 10
> symbols, contains at least 2 spaces).
>
(I know this thread has been done to death - but anyway) I'm sure there 
are maintainers who find the 'weightless' [abrt] bugs useful in certain 
scenarios (if only for gauging prevalence). There is a lot of clutter, I 
think it would be nice to filter these somehow via query in bugzilla. 
Insisting on debuginfo and comments will mean that the average joe will 
never use abrt, and I see that as a loss somehow (ha ha - that would 
reduce the clutter)

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux