On 11/25/2010 11:38 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: > I think abrt is mostly useful tool, but it should be more interactive to > our users. No, most problem from it (at my experience and by other > answers there) because we got many reports dead at begining. Users > encountered fill bug report, but if it is new user, it in 90% cases even > do not answer on question how it may be reproduced. > I assume it is main bad there. > Can we add functionality track user bugreports and allow answer on > requests (as minimum with 'needinfo' state) directly from abrt?? > I think it may serious increase percentage of usefull bug reports from abrt. I think I agree with what you are saying - would be nice for bugzappers to be able to filter out [abrt] bugs without debug symbols and steps to reproduce - has anyone done this? If not I could probably have a crack at it using the bugzilla commandline over the weekend. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
