On 11/22/10 11:32 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:33:35PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On 11/22/10 1:50 PM, Till Maas wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:02:49PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: >>>> On 11/22/2010 11:56 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >>>>> It was my understanding of reading the complaints that this is what they >>>>> [complainers] desire - a reversal of what we require now (3 karma and/or >>>>> proventester if critpath). >>>> >>>> Critpath requires +1 proven tester and +1 anybody. Total of +2. Non >>>> crit-path requires a minimum of +1 anybody or a 7 day timeout I do believe. >>>> >>>> I do not believe we require +3 anywhere. We /default/ the karma >>>> autopush level at +3/-3, but that's just a suggestion. >>> >>> Afaik there is currently no distinction between the requirement for non >>> crit-path updates and the karma autopush level. Therefore by default >>> non critpath updates require +3 karma, unless this has been changed >>> since the beginning for the update criteria enforcement. > >> I swear I've been able to set karma levels at 1 for non-critpath updates. > > But this means that the update is automatically pushed to stable, not > that the update is approved and then pushed to stable when the > maintainer requests it. > > Regards > Till > I'm sorry, I didn't realize that's what you were arguing about. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
